Introduction
Cannabis sativa L. is a plant with a very complex chemical composition and with a high potential from a pharmaceutical point of view. It includes both psychoactive and non-psychoactive (hemp) varieties, based on the cannabinoid profile. Particularly, non-psychotropic C. sativa is characterized by low levels of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC), which is usually below 0.2-0.3%. In the fresh plant material the typical components are represented by cannabinoic acids, mainly cannabidiolic acid (CBDA) and cannabigerolic acid (CBGA) in hemp, followed by their decarboxylated or neutral counterparts, such as cannabidiol (CBD) and cannabigerol (CBG) [1,2]. Besides these cannabinoids, other classes are present in the plant, even if the full cannabinoid composition of the plant is still under investigation. CBD is a bioactive compound, which has demonstrated to possess several biological activities, including the antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective and antiepileptic ones [1,3]. Moreover, several studies have highlighted its antiproliferative activity on different cancer cell lines, even if its mechanism/s of action is still under investigation [4].
In addition to cannabinoids, hemp contains other chemical classes of bioactive compounds, such as polyphenols and policosanols (PCs).
Regarding polyphenols, different classes of phenolics have been identified in the plant [5]. Cannflavins are the typical isoprenoid flavones of C. sativa, with cannflavin A and B (CFL-A and CFL-B) as the most representative ones [5]. These compounds have been demonstrated to possess antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antiparasitic, and antiviral activities [5,6]. However, there are still few studies of their antiproliferative activity, making the investigation of their bioactivity an important topic.
Finally, PCs are long-chain aliphatic alcohols extracted from different natural waxes. They are characterized by a carbon chain length ranging from 22 to 36 carbon atoms. These compounds are present in different natural matrixes, including C. sativa [7,8]. PCs have shown diverse biological properties, even if the available data regarding their antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity are limited.
In the light of all the above, my PhD project is a multi-disciplinary study, based on the extraction and analysis of non-psychotropic C. sativa, for the recovery of bioactive compounds belonging to the chemical classes of cannabinoids, polyphenols and PCs. The activity of the enriched extracts obtained from the above-mentioned material, together with pure compounds, was assessed for an array of biological activities, with the focus on antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antiproliferative ones, using In vitro assays. The results will be described starting from the more polar to the less polar compounds investigated.
Identification of phenolic compounds from non-psychoactive Cannabis sativa L. by UHPLC-HRMS and In vitro assessment of the antiproliferative activity against colorectal cancer cell lines
In the first part of my project, the attention was aimed at obtaining a polyphenol-enriched fraction (PEF) from decarboxylated non-psychotropic C. sativa inflorescences to evaluate its antiproliferative activity against human colon adenocarcinoma cell lines, in comparison with a conventional anticancer drug currently used in chemotherapy. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is indeed one of the most diagnosed cancers in high-income countries. One of the main concerns in CRC is that it can easily develop multidrug resistance, with consequent reduction or inefficacy of current anticancer drugs. Some polyphenol, such as quercetin, has already demonstrated to possess antiproliferative activity against colon cancer cell lines by modulating the expression of cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) [9]. Cannflavins, which are chemically related to quercetin, represent new possible compounds to be investigated for the treatment of CRC.
In the light of this, a new extraction and purification method was developed in this work for C. sativa polyphenols [10]. Decarboxylated inflorescences were submitted to a dynamic pre-maceration with n-hexane, to remove lipophilic compounds, followed by a dynamic maceration with a MeOH/acetone (90:10 v/v) with 0.1% HCOOH solution. The extract was then purified by preparative flash column chromatography under normal phase conditions to remove cannabinoids and other coeluting compounds [10]. Cannabinoids free fractions were then combined and brought to dryness, obtaining PEF.
Then, an UHPLC-HRMS method was developed and optimized to fully characterize the extract [10]. After the untargeted qualitative analysis, 32 different phenolic compounds were identified, by comparing their fragmentation pattern with the ones already described in literature. The same chromatographic conditions were applied to quantify the main components of PEF, using HPLC-UV. The main components resulted to be CFL-A, CFL-B and N-trans-feruloyltyramine, with a concentration of 10.7 ± 0.8, 8.1 ± 0.3 and 17.7 ± 2.2 mg/g, respectively.
Secondly, the biological activity of PEF and of its main components was assessed on human CRC cell lines Caco-2 and SW480 [10]. Cells were cultured on a 96-well plate and treated with PEF and pure compounds for 24 and 48 h. The best results were achieved after 48 h of treatment in SW480 cell line with PEF and CFL-A, which resulted to have IC50 values of 3.6 µg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/mL and 34.7 µM, respectively. This value is lower than the one obtained with the chemotherapy drug cisplatin, making both PEF and CFL-A possible new therapeutic products to be further investigated for their bioactivity against CRC.
Extraction, analysis and In vitro evaluation of the antiproliferative activity of cannabinoids from non-psychoactive Cannabis sativa L. against glioblastoma multiforme cancer cell lines
In the second part of the project, the research was addressed at the extraction and full characterization of a fraction enriched in cannabinoids (CEF) from non-psychotropic C. sativa, to evaluate its antiproliferative activity against human glioblastoma cancer cell lines, in comparison with conventional anticancer drugs currently used in chemotherapy. Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is one of the most frequent malignant primary tumours, characterized by high proliferation, invasion, migration, angiogenesis and resistance to conventional anticancer drugs. Since CBD is able to cross the blood brain barrier and to decrease cancer cell proliferation, this compound deserves to be further investigated for the treatment of this pathology [11].
To this aim, CEF was obtained by dynamic maceration with ethanol of the plant material (inflorescences). The extract was then qualitatively characterized with a dedicated UHPLC-HRMS method, while and HPLC-UV was used to quantify the main compounds. After the untargeted qualitative analysis, 28 cannabinoids, including the minor ones, were identified, by comparing the obtained fragmentation pattern with the ones already described in literature. However, its main component resulted to be CBD, with a concentration of 403.1 ± 9.9 mg/g.
CEF was then tested for its activity against GBM cancer cell lines, being U87MG and T98G. After 48 h of treatment CEF showed an IC50 value around 20 and 25 µg/mL in U87MG and T98G cells, respectively. CBD (being the main component of CEF) was also tested, providing IC50 values around 20 and 25 µM in U87MG and T98G cells, respectively, after 48 h of treatment. Temozolomide, being the current anticancer drug used in chemotherapy, gave IC50 values higher than 100 µM in both cell lines at 24 and 48 h of treatment.
Then, a cell migration assay was performed to check whether the cannabinoids were able to decrease cell migration. To achieve this, cells were cultured in a 6-well plate and, after 24 h, treated with CEF at the concentration of 20 µg/mL. The migration assay showed a decrease of cell mobility, when cells are exposed to cannabinoids. Taking in consideration the Random Mobility Coefficients (RMCs), representing the distance covered by a single cell over a given period of time, the means of the obtained RMCs of U87MG cells treated with CEF was significantly lower than the one of control (p < 0.05). CEF was in fact able to drop the RMC value by 83%, in comparison to the RMC mean value of control.
The experimental data indicate cannabinoids as promising candidates for the treatment of GBM. The existence of a possible new target for CBD, involved in cell mobility and migration is plausible. Now the research is focused to a deeper investigation of the mechanism/s of action of cannabinoids, with a focus on CBD.
Extraction, purification and In vitro assessment of the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity of policosanols from non-psychoactive Cannabis sativa L.
This third part of the project was aimed at the extraction and purification of PCs from an innovative source, represented by a wax obtained from supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) from the inflorescences of non-psychotropic C. sativa. Then, the obtained purified PCs were tested for their In vitro antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity.
Initially, PCs were obtained by microwave-assisted trans-esterification and hydrolysis combined in a single step, followed by preparative liquid chromatography under normal phase conditions [12]. The purified product was characterized using a new method based on high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with an evaporative light scattering detector (ELSD) [13]. The quantitative analysis of the purified mixture from hemp wax revealed hexacosanol (C26OH) and octacosanol (C28OH) as the main compounds, with a concentration of 181 ± 0.2 and 130.5 ± 2 mg/g, respectively.
The antiproliferative activity of PCs was initially assessed against a panel of human cancer cell lines, but the results indicated no cytotoxic activity. In vitro cell-free and cell-based antioxidant and anti-inflammatory assays were then performed on the purified mixture [12]. The results indicated an inhibition of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, a reduction of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-?B) activation and of the activity of the neutrophil elastase. Immunoblotting assays allowed us to hypothesize the mechanism of action of the compounds of interest, given the higher levels of MAPK-activated protein kinase 2 (MK2) and heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) protein expression in the PC pretreated HaCaT cells. Even if more research is needed to unveil other molecular mechanisms involved in PC activity from non-psychotropic C. sativa, the results of this work suggest that these compounds may have potential for use in oxinflammation processes.
Conclusions
As an overall conclusion, during this PhD project it was possible to prepare and fully characterize three different extracts from non-psychotropic C. sativa, enriched in different chemical classes of compounds, that were tested for their bioactivity together with pure molecules.
PEF was obtained after the development and optimization of a dedicated extraction procedure and a reliable analytical method based on UHPLC-HRMS. This extract and pure CFL-A were tested against CRC, providing promising results, even if further research is needed to elucidate their mechanism of action.
CEF was fully characterized using UHPLC-HRMS and tested against GBM cell lines, being able to reduce cell viability and their migration after the treatment. Taking this as a starting point for future bioassays, further studies are ongoing to identify the mechanism of action of CBD, the main compound of the extract.
Finally, PCs from hemp wax were purified with an innovative extraction method and then submitted to chemical analysis using HPLC-ELSD. The results of the biological assays clearly indicated their ability to decrease oxinflammation process.
Two paths of potential new drug development against cancer cell proliferation and oxinflammation have emerged from this work. One approach is focused on developing standardized products that are directly derived from non-psychoactive C. sativa. The other is based on a single molecule approach, whereby individual compounds with therapeutic potential are identified and tested for pharmaceutical development.
References
[1] Pellati F., Borgonetti V., Brighenti V., Biagi M., Benvenuti S., Corsi L. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 1-15.
[2] Pellati F., Brighenti V., Sperlea J., Marchetti L., Bertelli D., Benvenuti S. Molecules. 2018, 23, 2639.
[3] Costa A.-M., Senn L., Anceschi L., Brighenti V., Pellati F., Biagini G. Pharmaceuticals. 2021, 14, 1259.
[4] Anceschi L., Codeluppi A., Brighenti V., Tassinari R., Taglioli V., Marchetti L., Roncati L. Alessandrini A., Corsi L., Pellati F. Phytother. Res. 2022, 36, 914-927.
[5] Pollastro F., Minassi A., Fresu L.G. Curr. Med. Chem. 2018, 25, 1160-1185
[6] Bautista J.L., Yu S., Tian L. ACS Omega. 2021, 6, 5119-5123.
[7] Venturelli A., Brighenti V., Mascolo D., Pellati F. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2019, 172, 200-205.
[8] Montone C.M., Aita S.E., Cannazza G., Cavaliere C., Cerrato A., Citti C., Mondello L., Piovesana S., Lagana A., Capriotti A.L. Talanta. 2021, 235, 122778.
[9] Mirazimi S.M.A., Dashti F., Tobeiha M., Shahini A., Jafari R., Khoddami M., Sheida A.H., EsnaAshari P., Aflatoonian A.H., Elikaii F., Zakeri M.S., Hamblin M.R., Aghajani M., Bavarsadkarimi M., Mirzaei H. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 860209.
[10] Caroli C., Brighenti V., Cattivelli A., Salamone S., Pollastro F., Tagliazucchi D., Pellati F. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2023, 236, 115723.
[11] Buchalska B., Kaminska K., Owe-Larsson M., Cudnoch-Jedrzejewska A. Pharmacol. Rep. 2024, 76, 223-234.
[12] Caroli C., Baron G., Cappellucci G., Brighenti V., Della Vedova L., Fraulini F., Oliaro-Bosso S., Alessandrini A., Zambon A., Lusvardi G., Aldini G., Biagi M., Corsi L., Pellati F. Heliyon. 2024, 10, e30291.
[13] Brighenti V., Venturelli A., Caroli C., Anceschi L., Gjikolaj M., Durante C., Pellati F. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2023, 234, 115547.